"Arcady And Boris Strugatsky. Prisoners of Power" - читать интересную книгу автораArcady And Boris Strugatsky. Prisoners of Power
Copyright Arcady And Boris Strugatsky Copyright Introduction by Theodore Sturgeon. Copyright Translated from the Russian by Helen Saltz Jacobson, 1977 Copyright Collier Books: A Division of Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc, New York; Collier Macmillan Publishing, London Origin: "Obitaemyj ostrov" OCR: Vladislav Zarya INTRODUCTION Early in these pages, when young Maxim dips his hand into a river on the alien planet on which he has just been marooned, and withdraws it hastily because the water is radioactive, the knowledgeable science fiction reader is likely to say, "Come on, now, fellows - how could he know? Or, if it were so devastatingly, dangerously radioactive that he could determine it without instruments, how could he notnot know before he stuck iris silly hand in it?" But one forgives, proceeds in a smug and self-satisfied way, because Maxim's adventures are adventurous indeed, his encounters believable, suspenseful, unexpected, and quite beyond anticipation, the Strugatskys being the plot-masters that they are. being what he is, could most certainly perform that small feat at the river, and would; further, the reader realizes that this discovery was made some time back, indirectly, in the gradual unfolding of Maxim's character. This knack - the conscious commission of apparent illogic, quietly rectified in later narration - is typical Strugatsky. It is the gleeful and deliberate provocation of criticism, in the sure knowledge that the criticism is made on the basis of insufficient data, and that the critic will be shown to be, in the true sense of the word, prejudiced - pre-judging. After this has happened to the reader a number of times (and it does) the reader has no recourse but to trust the authors - and no author could ask for more than that. Few, however, can command your trust so deftly. There is a great deal more in the Strugatsky bag of tricks. They will, for example, build up a vertiginous altitude of suspense (as in the scene where Maxim is sent to execute prisoners, one of them a woman) ending with a shocking twist - and then proceed with something else, happening to someone else days later, joyfully refusing for the longest time to tell you just what has happened to Maxim. And when they do, what has happened to him is all over, part of his past, and we find him engaged in something quite new. Yet the tapestry is ultimately done and hung, the authors having completed certain panels while you weren't looking. Then there's the matter of the shifting point-of-view. Any good creative writing professor (though there are those who maintain there is no such thing) will tell you that only one character permits the reader inside |
|
|