"Page0086" - читать интересную книгу автора (Bloom Howard - The Lucifer Principle (htm))7 dist urbing, each of the formulations seemed based in large part on the premise that the individual is the basic unit of evolutionary change. Competition between groups had been shuffled off the stage. Then, in 1962, the Scottish ecologist V.C. Wynne-Edwards, a careful observer of his country's native red grouse, concluded that these birds sometimes sacrificed their reproductive privileges to keep their flock from starvation. The grouse, Edwards contended, sensed the amount of food the moors could provide each year and adjusted their behavior accordingly, delaying breeding when supplies looked meager or even opting for total chastity.12 The interests of the group, concluded Edwards, overrode those of the individual. The backlash to the University of Aberdeen professor's heresy was immediate and intense. Scientists like G.C. Williams and David Lack declared that group selection was "all but impossible."13 And august theorists like W.D. Hamilton and R.L. Trivers explained away the "altruistic" tendencies Wynne-Edwards had discerned by generating a new mathematical system, the theory of kin selection, which said that individuals would only sacrifice their own interests in favor of others if the others in question were relatives, creatures who contained similar sets of genes.14 In other words, self-sacrifice represented an individualistic gene selfishly protecting a copy of itself. The newly-consolidated theories of individual and kin selection were hailed as major achievements and became biological dogma. Wynne-Edwards' carefully-reasoned theory, based on decades of fact gathering in the field, was tossed aside as a disreputable aberration. So the Scotsman spent fourteen years in the heather gathering fresh information, tabulated the resulting statistics, then printed the conclusions in his 1986 work Evolution Through Group Selection. The book was virtually ignored.15 However, in the late '80s, an uneasy sense that evolution may not be limited to the level of the individual organism or gene showed signs of inching toward sciences' peripheral vision. Stephen Jay Gould puzzled over the fact that there's too much genetic variation--more 7 dist urbing, each of the formulations seemed based in large part on the premise that the individual is the basic unit of evolutionary change. Competition between groups had been shuffled off the stage. Then, in 1962, the Scottish ecologist V.C. Wynne-Edwards, a careful observer of his country's native red grouse, concluded that these birds sometimes sacrificed their reproductive privileges to keep their flock from starvation. The grouse, Edwards contended, sensed the amount of food the moors could provide each year and adjusted their behavior accordingly, delaying breeding when supplies looked meager or even opting for total chastity.12 The interests of the group, concluded Edwards, overrode those of the individual. The backlash to the University of Aberdeen professor's heresy was immediate and intense. Scientists like G.C. Williams and David Lack declared that group selection was "all but impossible."13 And august theorists like W.D. Hamilton and R.L. Trivers explained away the "altruistic" tendencies Wynne-Edwards had discerned by generating a new mathematical system, the theory of kin selection, which said that individuals would only sacrifice their own interests in favor of others if the others in question were relatives, creatures who contained similar sets of genes.14 In other words, self-sacrifice represented an individualistic gene selfishly protecting a copy of itself. The newly-consolidated theories of individual and kin selection were hailed as major achievements and became biological dogma. Wynne-Edwards' carefully-reasoned theory, based on decades of fact gathering in the field, was tossed aside as a disreputable aberration. So the Scotsman spent fourteen years in the heather gathering fresh information, tabulated the resulting statistics, then printed the conclusions in his 1986 work Evolution Through Group Selection. The book was virtually ignored.15 However, in the late '80s, an uneasy sense that evolution may not be limited to the level of the individual organism or gene showed signs of inching toward sciences' peripheral vision. Stephen Jay Gould puzzled over the fact that there's too much genetic variation--more |
|
© 2026 Библиотека RealLib.org
(support [a t] reallib.org) |